ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2026
A fast fully automated approach for evaluating calcified lesions in intravascular ultrasound.
Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Catheter-based coronary intervention is an effective treatment for acute coronary syndrome. However, calcified plaques pose significant challenges within these procedures, as they complicate stent deployment and passage of devices. This study presents novel research for calcium detection in intravascular ultrasound data dealing with weak labelling. Methods and results: Encoding-decoding network architecture is adapted to predict the angle-wise existence of calcification in intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) data, enabling the interpretation of predictive behaviour by observing the attention map at the penultimate layer. We explore several practical factors, including the training of five candidate models and their average ensembling, enhancing dataset diversity, and optimizing filter size for post-processing. The algorithm is developed using stored DICOM data from 42 patients. Employing a five-fold cross-validation training strategy, we achieve an average accuracy of 0.90 and a Dice score ranging of 0.88 in testing performance. The attention map shows that the trained model learned to use image features to support its decisions, resembling the manner of trained IVUS experts. Comparing the computed calcium scores to the ground truth confirms that using average resembling followed by post-processing with a filter size of 61 A-lines and 13 frames yields the best performance. The window is surprisingly larger than what is typically used in the literature, likely due to its high noise ratio in IVUS images. Conclusion: The detection and quantification pipeline holds promise for accelerating clinical research, particularly in elucidating the impact of calcified plaques on intervention procedures and prognosis. It may also serve as a powerful tool to assist in decision-making during interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.