ArticleJournal of liver transplantation2026
Expanding the donor pool: Outcomes of liver transplantation using grafts with ≥50% macrosteatosis.
Article in Journal of liver transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Liver grafts with over 50% macrosteatosis are often deemed marginal, but organ shortages necessitate exploring their use. We conducted five transplants with deceased donor grafts containing 50%-90% macrosteatosis, ensuring donor age <55 years, CIT ≤6 hours, and recipient laboratory MELD score ≤30. Two patients required reoperations due to thrombotic complications (acute HAT and PVT), and hospital stay ranged from 6 to 26 days. All patients survived beyond one year with functioning grafts. These findings suggest the feasibility of using high-macrosteatosis grafts in intermediate- to low-laboratory-MELD recipients, albeit with potential thrombotic risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.