Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41716900›Full record

ArticleCommunications earth & environment2026

Environmental variability shapes biodiversity and protected area priorities in Canada.

Rekha Marcus, Stefano Mezzini, Dwija Desai, Michael J Noonan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications earth & environment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rekha Marcus *Department of Biology, The University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, BC Canada.
Stefano Mezzini *Department of Biology, The University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, BC Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8551-7436
Dwija DesaiDepartment of Biology, The University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, BC Canada.
Michael J NoonanDepartment of Biology, The University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, BC Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4512-0535

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Priority areas are typically identified based on mean conditions, while ignoring variance around the mean (i.e., "stochasticity'). This is problematic as high environmental stochasticity can increase extinction risk and reduce the effectiveness of protected areas. Here we use daily Normalized Difference Vegetation Index data from 1981 to 2025 to generate spatially-explicit estimates of both the mean and variance in environmental productivity across Canada. From these models, we found that environmental stochasticity shows strong spatial structure and has been steadily increasing over the past four decades. Additionally, stochasticity had a negative effect on species richness. We found no clear relationship between stochasticity and protection status, suggesting that Canada's network of protected areas are not well-buffered against a climate-change induced increase in stochasticity. Promisingly, we identified 2,709,580 km

Indexed as

BiogeographyClimate-change ecologyEcological modelling

Identifiers

PMID41716900
PMCPMC12915523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.