ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Assessing daydreaming frequency and control with the Polish version of the Daydreaming Frequency Scale - validation using ecological momentary assessment.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Not all task-unrelated thoughts (TUT) are created equal - TUT characteristics as predictors of affective states and heart-rate variability.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Maladaptive task-unrelated thoughts: Self-control failure or avoidant behavior? Preliminary evidence from an experience sampling study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Daydreaming is a prevalent type of cognitive activity, in which the content of one's thoughts is unrelated to the current task. The Daydreaming Frequency Scale (DDFS) was the first questionnaire devised to measure the occurrence of daydreaming and remains widely used for this purpose today. We report on three studies validating the Polish version of the DDFS. Study 1 (n=385) examines its factor validity, internal consistency, and criterion validity (tested by computing correlations with the scores of other questionnaires measuring similar phenomena and known consequences of daydreaming). Study 2 (n=1301) confirms the factor structure established in Study 1 and provides additional test-retest analyses conducted over a three-month interval. Study 3 (n=214) tests the link between the trait-level DDFS score and daily occurrence of task-unrelated thoughts (TUTs) and the degree of everyday control over such thoughts, using ecological momentary assessment (EMA). During the factor validity analysis, we tested the possibility of implementing a two-factor structure solution; however, after careful consideration, the original one-factor structure was retained. The Polish DDFS demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = .92). The results of the correlation-based criterion validity testing were also satisfactory. The findings of Study 3 suggest that DDFS score is positively related to actual daily TUTs occurrence and negatively related to daily thought control, further supporting the good criterion validity of the questionnaire.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.