Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41716825›Full record

ArticleAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui)2026

Differential impacts of dietary distillers' dried grains with solubles levels on Cherry Valley ducks: Insights into meat quality and intestinal health.

Yang Liu, Jianguo Deng, Yueqin Xie, Junlei Chang, Hua Zhao, Xiaoling Chen, Guangmang Liu, Jiayong Tang, Gang Tian, Jingyi Cai and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yang LiuKey Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition China Ministry of Education, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, China.
Jianguo DengKey Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition China Ministry of Education, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, China.
Yueqin XieKey Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition China Ministry of Education, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, China.
Junlei ChangKey Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition China Ministry of Education, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, China.
Hua ZhaoKey Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition China Ministry of Education, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, China.
Xiaoling ChenKey Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition China Ministry of Education, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, China.
Guangmang LiuKey Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition China Ministry of Education, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, China.
Jiayong TangKey Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition China Ministry of Education, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, China.
Gang TianKey Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition China Ministry of Education, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, China.
Jingyi CaiKey Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition China Ministry of Education, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, China.
Gang JiaKey Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition China Ministry of Education, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the effects of dietary distillers' dried grains with solubles (DDGS) levels on nutrient digestibility, meat quality, and intestinal health in meat ducks. In a 28-d feeding trial (Exp. 1), 400 Cherry Valley ducks (average body weight [BW] = 658.73 ± 3.79 g, age = 14 d old) were randomly assigned to five groups receiving 0 (CON), 5%, 10%, 15%, or 20% DDGS. Each treatment had eight replicates (cages) with ten ducks per replicate. A subsequent metabolism trial (Exp. 2) was conducted using the same diets. At 42 d of age, two ducks per replicate were randomly selected and fed diets supplemented with 0.5% titanium dioxide for digestibility determination. Results showed that 20% DDGS significantly reduced the digestibility of gross energy (GE;

Indexed as

Distillers' dried grains with solubleIntestinal healthMeat duckMeat quality

Identifiers

PMID41716825
PMCPMC12914444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.