Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41716797›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026

Does tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy improve survival outcomes in patients with advanced melanoma?

Piper Ridley-Parish

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Piper Ridley-ParishSchool of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metastatic melanoma is an aggressive form of cancer, with poor patient outcomes when first-line treatments fail. Success has been seen in checkpoint blockade immunotherapies such as anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA4 treatments, however long-term use results in resistance. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapy is effective in treating melanoma as a second-line option, particularly in cancers such as melanoma, breast and ovarian cancer. With the 2024 FDA approval of Iifileucel (Amtagvi), a type of TIL therapy, this literature review aims to establish how effectively TIL therapy can treat metastatic and advanced melanomas, to evaluate if this type of therapy should be approved in the UK. A detailed search of databases Medline and Cochrane Library was conducted using terms related to "tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy" and "advanced melanoma" focusing on peer-reviewed research and phase II/III clinical trials published between 2015 and 2025. Studies were included if written in English and reported survival-related outcomes. The evidence highlights TIL therapy as an effective treatment for late-stage melanoma, with up to 20% of patients showing complete responses and all studies regarding TIL therapy as equally effective or more successful than the control drugs used. However, some studies reported adverse effects, mostly linked to lymphodepleting chemotherapy. Overall, the literature indicates that TIL therapy is a breakthrough drug that could change the treatment of melanoma, and allow patients another, effective treatment option, after first-line treatments are no longer suitable. This review concludes that future research should focus on larger cohort studies, and cost-effectiveness investigations to support approval in the UK.

Indexed as

advanced melanomacheckpoint inhibitorsCTLA4IL-2metastatic melanomatumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy

Identifiers

PMID41716797
PMCPMC12913130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.