ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2026
Construction and validation of an evaluation index system for healthy villages in China: A human-AI synergistic approach integrating modified Delphi and AHP.
Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Research on healthy villages in China is currently constrained by limited evaluation criteria and a lack of systemic comprehensiveness. This study aims to develop a scientifically rigorous evaluation index system that is tailored to the regional characteristics of China. Method: A modified Delphi method was employed to screen indicators based on literature review and expert consultation, followed by the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to determine the weights of these indicators. Innovatively, this study adopted a Human-AI synergistic approach throughout the research lifecycle; generative AI was utilized to refine indicator semantics during the Delphi phase, while an LLM-assisted comparative analysis served as a robustness check for the weighting system. Additionally, empirical validation was conducted in three pilot villages. Results: The final system consists of 7 first-level, 31 s-level, and 61 third-level indicators. Metrics from expert consultations were satisfactory, with authority coefficients exceeding 0.80 and demonstrating strong coordination ( Conclusion: The constructed index system integrates multi-dimensional health factors with a scientifically rigorous design validated through this Human-AI synergistic strategy. Ultimately, this approach pioneers new pathways for the deep integration of artificial intelligence and public health management, while providing a reference model for developing comprehensive evaluation systems in other developing countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.