ArticleAddictive behaviors reports2026
Validation of the DSM-5 internet gaming disorder framework for clinical diagnosis of problematic social media usage.
Article in Addictive behaviors reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Problematic social media usage (PUSM) has become a growing public health issue, with adolescents being particularly vulnerable. The absence of a standardized diagnostic tool has hindered consistent clinical identification and research advancement. To address this gap, the present study systematically evaluated the applicability of the DSM-5 Internet gaming disorder (IGD) criteria for diagnosing PUSM. Methods: A total of 405 participants were recruited and divided into five groups: PUSM, gaming disorder (GD), regular social media users (RSMU), regular gamers (RG), and healthy controls (HC). In this study, patients were evaluated using both ICD-11 and DSM-5. The ICD-11 criteria served as an external criterion, providing a benchmark for the validity testing of the DSM-5 framework. Results: The DSM-5 IGD criteria demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy (>80%) for both PUSM and GD, except "deception". The ICD-11 and DSM-5 criteria exhibited high consistency, though the ICD-11 criteria adopted a stricter diagnostic threshold. No significant differences were observed between the PUSM and GD groups in terms of symptom profiles, functional impairment, or clinical severity. Discussion and conclusions: This study provides empirical support for adopting the DSM-5 IGD diagnostic criteria as a standardized clinical tool for assessing PUSM. However, the "deception" criterion requires further validation due to its weak diagnostic performance. The findings further confirm the conceptual and symptomatic homogeneity between PUSM and IGD, supporting their classification within a unified behavioral addiction framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.