ArticlePatient preference and adherence2026
Factors Influencing Adherence to Home-Based Exercise Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients from a Temporal Perspective: An Explanatory Sequential Mixed-Methods Study.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a conceptual model of intertemporal decision-making ability for young and middle-aged stroke patients within physical activity: a qualitative study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Use and Dynamic Adjustment of Self-Control Strategies in Physical Activity Engagement Among Young and Middle-Aged Stroke Patients: A Qualitative Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- Exercise rehabilitation adherence and associated factors in patients aged ≥75 years with hemorrhagic stroke: a mixed-methods study.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Advancing the Understanding of Temporal Dynamics in Rehabilitation Adherence: Methodological Reflections on the Study by Shao et al [Letter].Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to examine the factors influencing the adherence of stroke patients to home-based exercise rehabilitation and to elucidate the potential driving mechanisms of temporal perspective on rehabilitation adherence. Patients and Methods: This study employed a sequential, explanatory, and mixed-methods design. In the quantitative phase, a questionnaire survey was conducted among 289 stroke patients from January 2025 to May 2025 using convenience sampling. In the qualitative phase, 16 stroke patients were selected from the quantitative sample through purposive and maximum variation sampling to explain and supplement the quantitative findings using semi-structured interviews. Results: Quantitative analysis demonstrated a significant positive correlation between temporal perspective and rehabilitation adherence, with rehabilitation intention partially mediating this relationship. Behavioral advantage exerted a negative moderating effect on the intention-adherence pathway, whereas the moderating effect of self-regulation ability did not reach statistical significance. Qualitative analysis identified four main themes: consistency belief, time-bound potency, behavioral advantage, and self-regulation ability. Conclusion: Temporal perspective is an important driver of adherence to home-based rehabilitation among stroke patients. As rehabilitation habits develop, behavioral patterns gradually shift from being "intention-driven" to becoming "automatic habits", thereby weakening the direct driving effect of intention. Given the potential presence of latent executive dysfunction in stroke patients, targeted assessment tools and intervention strategies should be developed to bridge the gap between intention and behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.