ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2026
Staging of Fabry cardiomyopathy in clinical practice: an algorithm proposal.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Fabry disease (FD) is characterized by hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and early diagnosis is essential, considering the response to enzyme replacement or chaperone therapies. Recently, a new clinical staging for Fabry cardiomyopathy suggested five stages (0A, 0B, IA, IB, II, III), where the imaging characterization of hypertrophy and fibrosis are critical key items. Our study aimed to evaluate the applicability of the recent proposal of Meucci et al. 2024 in patients with FD, considering the last imaging cardiac evaluations. Methods: This retrospective observational study collected clinical data from patients diagnosed with FD. Staging system followed a hierarchical flowchart, staging patients based on LVEF, LGE, LV wall thickness, and other cardiac findings (symptoms, ECG/Echo/CMR abnormalities). Results: We included 53 FD patients. As cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiogram parameters are essential to complete staging, the algorithm was fully applied to 44 patients. Among these patients, the majority (29,5%) were in the non-hypertrophic stage 0. In hypertrophic stage I, 27,2% of patients were classified according to the maximum wall thickness. The hypertrophic fibrotic stage II included 29,5% of the patients. Patients in stage III (13,6%) presented diffuse myocardial fibrosis ≥ 3 LV segments and/or impaired systolic function (LVEF < 50%). Conclusion: The staging scheme allows us to classify different stages of FD cardiomyopathy. Most patients were in early disease stages, probably related to the diagnosis in the context of familial screening. The stepwise algorithm proposal helped apply the staging in clinical practice; however, it must be validated in more extensive and prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.