ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia2026
Performance and utility of contact tracing for COVID-19 in the WHO South-East Asia Region: implications for future pandemic preparedness.
Review in The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Contact tracing was widely implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic, but its real-world performance and utility for decision-making remain poorly understood. A qualitative study was conducted to appraise the performance and utility of contact tracing for COVID-19 in the WHO South-East Asia Region, based on interviews with government and non-governmental organisation technical staff and decision makers in Indonesia, Nepal and Thailand. Our findings highlight the good performance of contact tracing when sufficiently resourced and when case load is low, but reveal declining utility as case incidence increases. This study presents key definitions and a pragmatic approach for appraising contact tracing performance and utility throughout a major health emergency response. Countries should prospectively define objectives for contact tracing, establish monitoring and evaluation frameworks, adjust their contact tracing approaches informed by risk assessments, and consider other available public health interventions when its performance and utility decline. Funding: Governments of Germany and Australia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.