Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41716714›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia2026

Performance and utility of contact tracing for COVID-19 in the WHO South-East Asia Region: implications for future pandemic preparedness.

Melanie Bannister-Tyrrell, Kirsty Teague, Daniel Ll Strachan, Anna Barrett, Tiara Marthias, Clare E Strachan, Pawinee Doungngern, Nishant Thakur, Mushtofa Kamal, Hannah Brindle and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Melanie Bannister-TyrrellNossal Institute for Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Kirsty TeagueNossal Institute for Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Daniel Ll StrachanNossal Institute for Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Anna BarrettNossal Institute for Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Tiara MarthiasNossal Institute for Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Clare E StrachanNossal Institute for Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Pawinee DoungngernDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand.
Nishant ThakurWorld Health Organization, Country Office for Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Mushtofa KamalWorld Health Organization, Regional Office for South-East Asia, New Delhi, India.
Hannah BrindleWorld Health Organization, Regional Office for South-East Asia, New Delhi, India.
Yuka JinnaiWorld Health Organization, Regional Office for South-East Asia, New Delhi, India.
Masaya KatoWorld Health Organization, Regional Office for South-East Asia, New Delhi, India.
Florian VogtThe Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contact tracing was widely implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic, but its real-world performance and utility for decision-making remain poorly understood. A qualitative study was conducted to appraise the performance and utility of contact tracing for COVID-19 in the WHO South-East Asia Region, based on interviews with government and non-governmental organisation technical staff and decision makers in Indonesia, Nepal and Thailand. Our findings highlight the good performance of contact tracing when sufficiently resourced and when case load is low, but reveal declining utility as case incidence increases. This study presents key definitions and a pragmatic approach for appraising contact tracing performance and utility throughout a major health emergency response. Countries should prospectively define objectives for contact tracing, establish monitoring and evaluation frameworks, adjust their contact tracing approaches informed by risk assessments, and consider other available public health interventions when its performance and utility decline. Funding: Governments of Germany and Australia.

Indexed as

Contact tracingCOVID-19Pandemic preparednessPerformanceSouth-East AsiaUtility

Identifiers

PMID41716714
PMCPMC12915255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.