ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026
Effects of concurrent training on speed and agility performance in soccer referees.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Soccer referees are exposed to high aerobic and anaerobic demands during match play, yet evidence regarding training strategies that simultaneously enhance speed and agility in this population remains limited. This study aimed to examine the effects of a 12-week concurrent training program on sprint and agility performance in soccer referees and to evaluate the sustainability of these effects through a follow-up assessment. To our knowledge, few intervention studies have simultaneously examined both sprint speed and agility performance in soccer referees and evaluated whether these adaptations are retained during a follow-up period. Importantly, the inclusion of a follow-up assessment provides evidence on the retention of training-induced adaptations, which has rarely been examined in referee populations under applied field-based training conditions. Methods: Fifty male soccer referees officiating in amateur leagues were assigned to a control group (n = 25) or an experimental group (n = 25). Both groups completed standard referee training twice weekly for 12 weeks, while the experimental group additionally performed concurrent training sessions combining endurance-based interval running and strength-power exercises twice per week. Sprint and agility performance were assessed using the 100 m sprint test and the Illinois Agility Test at pre-test, post-test, and 7-week follow-up. Data were analyzed using two-way mixed repeated measures ANOVA. Results: Significant Group × Time interaction effects were observed for both sprint and agility performance (p < 0.01) with moderate-to-large interaction effects. The experimental group demonstrated greater improvements in 100 m sprint and Illinois Agility Test performance compared with the control group following the intervention. Importantly, these performance gains were largely maintained at follow-up, indicating sustained training adaptations. Conclusion: A 12-week concurrent training program integrated into standard referee conditioning resulted in significant and sustained improvements in speed and agility performance. These findings highlight the effectiveness of concurrent training as a multidimensional approach to enhancing physical capacities that are critical for soccer refereeing and support its practical implementation within referee training programs. These results support the integration of concurrent training into referee conditioning programs to improve movement efficiency and match positioning capacity. Practitioners may consider concurrent training as a feasible strategy to improve and maintain key physical qualities required for match positioning across competitive phases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.