ReviewDrugs in context2026
Antibiotic treatment for neonatal sepsis: changing trends and future directions.
Review in Drugs in context, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plasma transfusion in neonatal sepsis.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in a Low-Middle Income Country: Impact of an Antibiotic Guideline for Neonatal Early-Onset Sepsis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Retrospective Study of Pathogen Distribution and Antimicrobial Resistance in 283 Neonates with Bloodstream Infections at a Grade-A Tertiary Hospital in China, 2021-2024.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neonatal sepsis is a serious and life-threatening condition with high morbidity and mortality, especially in preterm neonates in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). This article provides an updated review on the aetiology and diagnosis of neonatal sepsis, antibiotic management and antibiotic stewardship. Methods: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Scopus in January 2025, using the following MeSH terms: "sepsis", "neonate" and "antibiotic". Meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, clinical trials and reviews published in the English language from 2005 to 2025 with patients in the neonatal age group were included. A total of 715 articles were identified and screened, and 85 studies were included in the final review. Results: Neonatal sepsis remains a leading cause of mortality, with distinct pathogens identified in early-onset and late-onset sepsis, ventilator-associated pneumonia, urinary tract infection and fungal infections. Early recognition, accurate diagnosis and timely commencement of empirical antibiotics are paramount for improved outcomes. Fungal prophylaxis is considered for at-risk neonates in some NICUs with a high incidence of fungal infection. Universal group B Conclusion: Effective management of neonatal sepsis relies on early pathogen identification, judicious use of antibiotics and good antimicrobial stewardship. Future research directions include development of evidence-based protocols and improvement of rapid diagnostic techniques, combined with close monitoring and individualized care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.