ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
Deep learning-radiomics assessment of intervertebral disc and paraspinal muscle heterogeneity for predicting postoperative recurrent lumbar disc herniation.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Although imaging and paraspinal muscle parameters are linked to postoperative recurrent lumbar disc herniation (PRLDH), micro-level texture characteristics and their interactions remain underexplored. This study applied deep learning (DL)-radiomics to quantify the microstructural heterogeneity of responsible intervertebral discs and paraspinal muscles (L3-S1), and assessed a combined disc-muscle model for predicting PRLDH. Method: Clinical and imaging data from 170 lumbar disc herniation (LDH) patients undergoing percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery (Jan 2022-Dec 2024) were retrospectively analyzed. DL and radiomics features were extracted from intervertebral discs and paraspinal muscles. Feature selection via mutual information was followed by construction of a DL-radiomics Radscore model. Internal validation used leave-one-out, 10-fold cross-validation, and bootstrapping. Pfirrmann grading performance was compared with the disc Radscore, and potential disc-muscle interactions were explored using optimal cutoffs. Results: Among 170 patients, 39 had postoperative recurrence. Disc Radscore included 2 DL and 3 radiomics features, while muscle Radscore comprised 2 DL and 5 radiomics features. The disc Radscore demonstrated good predictive ability (AUC 0.857, 95% CI 0.797-0.918) across validation methods (AUC 0.846-0.857). Muscle Radscore showed moderate performance (AUC 0.718, 95% CI 0.627-0.809). Pfirrmann grade poorly predicted recurrence (AUC 0.506, 95% CI 0.412-0.600). Combined disc-muscle analysis was less stable than disc Radscore alone. Conclusion: DL-radiomics-derived intervertebral disc Radscore robustly predicts PRLDH. While combined disc-muscle assessment is less consistent, their interactions may inform postoperative risk stratification and management in LDH patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.