ArticleEcology and evolution2026
A Comparative Analysis of DNA Metabarcoding and Morphological Identification in Diatoms Reveals Similar Patterns of Environmental Response.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing Aquatic Environmental DNA, Microscopy and Sedimentary DNA to Investigate Cyanobacterial Community Dynamics Across a Trophic Gradient.Microbial ecology · 2026Article
- A Comparative Analysis of DNA Metabarcoding and Morphological Identification in Diatoms Reveals Similar Patterns of Environmental Response.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diatoms are widely used as environmental sentinels and are commonly studied through morphological identification. However, this method requires specialist knowledge, which is becoming increasingly scarce, resulting in species identification becoming costly, time-consuming, and difficult. DNA metabarcoding offers an alternative method to semiautomate some identification processes to circumvent these difficulties, thus minimizing identification costs while providing objective and reliable information. However, discrepancies between marker genes and morphological identification remain unsolved. This study investigated the 66 diatom communities on 26 high mountain mires in the Pyrenees by identifying morphological species and sequencing the Cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) and 18S rRNA markers. We assessed whether morphological and molecular approaches reveal the same patterns of alpha and beta diversity. Our results showed a strong correlation between beta diversity patterns of diatoms obtained by morphological identification and genetic markers. In contrast, alpha diversity calculated through molecular studies underestimated species richness and the Shannon index. The diatom community was chiefly driven by pH, Mg, and temperature, reflecting these patterns in morphological and molecular data. DNA metabarcoding also proved to represent diatom community patterns and the roles of the environmental drivers as clearly as in morphological identifications in high mountain mire diatom communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.