ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2026
Impact of Implant Site and Bone Quality on the Accuracy of Robot-Assisted Implant Placement: A Retrospective Study.
Article in International journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of Implant Site and Bone Quality on the Accuracy of Robot-Assisted Implant Placement: A Retrospective Study.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Robot-assisted surgery is widely used in implant dentistry; however, the specific effects of implant site and bone quality on its accuracy require further elucidation. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of implant site and bone quality on the accuracy of a single robotic-assisted implant placement method. Methods: This retrospective analysis included 83 patients who received 173 implants via a robot-assisted system. Implants were categorized by site into upper-anterior (UA), upper-posterior (UP), lower-anterior (LA), and lower-posterior (LP) regions and by bone quality into Type I-II and Type III-IV. Postoperative accuracy was assessed by comparing the planned versus actual implant positions, measuring lateral coronal deviation (LCD), vertical coronal deviation (VCD), and global coronal deviation (GCD); lateral apical deviation (LAD), vertical apical deviation (VAD), and global apical deviation (GAD); and angular deviation (AD). Results: When analyzed by implant site, the UA region demonstrated significantly larger vertical deviations (VCD and VAD) compared to the LP region (VCD: 0.99 ± 0.46 mm vs. 0.25 ± 0.53 mm, Conclusions: Both implant site and bone quality were found to influence the accuracy of the single robotic-assisted system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.