ArticleTransplantation direct2026
Understanding the Relationship Between Severe Donor Diabetes Insipidus, Kidney Donor Profile Index, and Recipient Kidney Function.
Article in Transplantation direct, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Severe diabetes insipidus (DI) causes dynamic changes in creatinine before organ donation. It is unknown whether terminal or peak creatinine is the optimal measure of graft quality among donors with severe DI. Methods: Adult donors after brain death were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing database, years 2015-2022. Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) was computed using both terminal creatinine (KDPI-Terminal) and peak creatinine (KDPI-Peak). Model fit for the prediction of graft failure and reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was compared. Logistic regression was used to determine the association between KDPI group reclassification and graft function. Results: Of 28 718 kidney transplants, 29% of donors met criteria for severe DI. No differences in estimated GFR (eGFR) or all-cause graft failure were observed on the basis of the presence of DI. Among donors with severe DI, KDPI-Peak improved prediction of reduced eGFR at 1 y (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m Conclusions: This national analysis confirms that while the presence of severe DI alone is not associated with graft outcomes, the use of peak creatinine significantly improves risk stratification of donor graft quality. Precise risk stratification is critical for efforts to improve appropriate kidney allocation and increase confidence in organ function after transplant.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.