Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41716445›Full record

ArticleTransplantation direct2026

Understanding the Relationship Between Severe Donor Diabetes Insipidus, Kidney Donor Profile Index, and Recipient Kidney Function.

Lucia Calthorpe, Miguel Nunez, Gerardo Gamino, Timothy P Copeland, Elaine Ku, Garrett R Roll

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation direct, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lucia CalthorpeDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0496-9471
Miguel NunezDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Gerardo GaminoSchool of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Timothy P CopelandDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Elaine KuDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Garrett R RollDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Severe diabetes insipidus (DI) causes dynamic changes in creatinine before organ donation. It is unknown whether terminal or peak creatinine is the optimal measure of graft quality among donors with severe DI. Methods: Adult donors after brain death were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing database, years 2015-2022. Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) was computed using both terminal creatinine (KDPI-Terminal) and peak creatinine (KDPI-Peak). Model fit for the prediction of graft failure and reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was compared. Logistic regression was used to determine the association between KDPI group reclassification and graft function. Results: Of 28 718 kidney transplants, 29% of donors met criteria for severe DI. No differences in estimated GFR (eGFR) or all-cause graft failure were observed on the basis of the presence of DI. Among donors with severe DI, KDPI-Peak improved prediction of reduced eGFR at 1 y (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m Conclusions: This national analysis confirms that while the presence of severe DI alone is not associated with graft outcomes, the use of peak creatinine significantly improves risk stratification of donor graft quality. Precise risk stratification is critical for efforts to improve appropriate kidney allocation and increase confidence in organ function after transplant.

Identifiers

PMID41716445
PMCPMC12915717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.