ArticleHealth science reports2026
Substance Use in Sports: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Professional Footballers in Accra, Ghana.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Substance Use in Sports: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Professional Footballers in Accra, Ghana.Health science reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Substance use in sports, though harmful, is common but with little evidence from Africa. This study aims to assess the prevalence and self-reported motivations for substance use, as well as to characterize the patterns of alcohol, tobacco, and cannabis use among professional footballers in Accra. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 139 professional footballers from nine teams competing in the Ghana Premier League and Division One League within the Greater Accra Region. Participants were selected using convenience sampling. Substance use was assessed with the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND), and Cannabis Use Disorders Identification Test-Revised (CUDIT-R) to evaluate alcohol, tobacco, and cannabis use patterns, respectively. Results: The prevalence of substance use was 44.6%, with caffeine prevalence highest (30.2%), followed by alcohol (15.8%), 2.9% for cannabis, and 2.2% for tobacco. The mean AUDIT score amongst alcohol users was 3.6 ( ± 3.7), representing low-risk consumption. The mean CUDIT-R score was 6.3 ( ± 4.6), consistent with low-risk cannabis use, while the mean FTND score was 0 ± 0, reflecting low nicotine dependence. Pleasure was the most frequently reported reason for alcohol, cannabis, and tobacco use, whereas energy enhancement was the main reason for caffeine use. Knowledge of performance-enhancing drugs was low (2.2%), and no participant reported their use. A negative association was observed between the number of years spent at the current club and substance use (OR = 0.81; 95% CI 0.65-0.99; Conclusions: Participants in this study reported high usage of caffeine and low usage of alcohol, cannabis, and nicotine. There was also low dependence on these substances. Pleasure or recreational use was the commonest reason for substance use. Caffeine was most popularly used for energy. Health education, counselling, and scheduled substance use monitoring of athletes are necessary to prevent inadvertent use, maintain low levels and prevent progression to high-risk use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.