Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41716400›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026

Recruitment of neutrophils by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in cancer patients undergoing immunotherapy: the good, the bad, and the unknown.

Irina Krykbaeva, Karishma Vijay Rupani, Johnson M Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Irina Krykbaeva *Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.
Karishma Vijay Rupani *Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.
Johnson M LiuDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is a cornerstone of supportive care in oncology, widely used to prevent chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and maintain dose intensity and treatment schedule. While G-CSF has been shown to be safe and effective in the context of chemotherapy, its effects in patients receiving chemo-immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are less clear. There is a growing body of preclinical data to suggest that G-CSF negatively impacts the tumor microenvironment in mice and may contribute to tumor growth and metastasis. Consequently, as chemo-immunotherapy regimens have become standard across solid malignancies, the immunologic consequences of G-CSF in this setting have come under renewed scrutiny. G-CSF is a pleiotropic cytokine, and one of its most prominent functions is to stimulate the proliferation and survival of neutrophils, which in the tumor microenvironment may exert both anti- and pro-tumorigenic roles. G-CSF stimulated neutrophils have been shown to contribute to the anti-tumor immune response via upregulation of unconventional T cells, maintenance of interferon gamma- based immunity, and direct tumor cell killing in some models. Other models, however, have shown that cytokine mixes containing G-CSF can polarize neutrophils towards a pro-tumorigenic state, promoting suppression of CD8+ T cells, creating an immunosuppressive cytokine milieu, and increasing metastatic potential. Ultimately, its effects appear to be dependent on the underlying immune state and composition of the tumor microenvironment. While preclinical data suggest that G-CSF may be blunting the efficacy of checkpoint blockade via its modulation of the neutrophil compartment in specific models, clinical data in the immunotherapy era remain limited and largely retrospective. Studies done primarily in lung cancer patients showed neither a clear survival benefit nor an increased mortality risk. In this review, we synthesize the preclinical and clinical literature examining G-CSF in solid tumor oncology, with a focus on its interaction with neutrophils and immune checkpoint inhibition. We highlight key mechanistic insights, emerging clinical signals, gaps in evidence, and ultimately emphasize the importance of adhering to strict, consensus guideline-based use of G-CSF during chemo-immunotherapy.

Indexed as

Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorImmunotherapyNeoplasmsNeutrophil InfiltrationNeutrophilsAnimalsHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsTumor MicroenvironmentGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorschemo-immunotherapyG-CSFimmune checkpoint inhibitorneutrophil recruitmenttumor-associated neutrophiltumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID41716400
PMCPMC12913084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.