ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Case Report: Successful treatment of pityriasis rubra pilaris with deucravacitinib.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deucravacitinib in dermatology: current indication and existing off-label data.Drugs in context · 2026Review
- Off-Label Uses of Deucravacitinib for Inflammatory Skin Conditions: Cases and Literature Review.Case reports in dermatological medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP) is a rare inflammatory skin disease characterized by hyperkeratotic follicular papules, palmoplantar hyperkeratosis, and associated normal "islands of unaffected skin". Its pathogenesis has not been fully elucidated, and treatment poses significant challenges. Conventional therapies include oral retinoids and topical emollients. In recent years, although biological agents have been used in treatment, they are associated with side effects such as an increased risk of infection, and some patients show no response to treatment, thus necessitating the exploration of new therapeutic approaches.This case represents the first reported use of a TYK2 inhibitor (deucravacitinib) for the treatment of PRP. The patient was a 39-year-old male who developed extensive erythema in December 2024. The erythema gradually increased and progressed to red punctate eruptions accompanied by mild desquamation, slight pruritus with a stinging sensation, and "islands of unaffected skin". Initial treatment with topical dinoprostone and mometasone furoate cream was ineffective. In March 2025, the patient received deucravacitinib (6 mg daily) in combination with topical halometasone cream. At the 1-month follow-up, significant improvements were observed in erythema, desquamation, and pruritus. At the final 6-month follow-up, the skin lesions almost resolved, leaving only mild erythema and a small amount of desquamation. Both the disease severity and the patient's quality of life were significantly improved. This case suggests that deucravacitinib exhibits favorable efficacy and safety in the treatment of PRP. However, due to the low incidence of PRP, which makes large-scale controlled trials difficult, and the lack of recognized treatment guidelines, more clinical studies are needed in the future to further verify the potential of deucravacitinib in the treatment of PRP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.