ReviewJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2025
Repeatability and reproducibility of a new classification for measuring primary stability of dental implants based on progressive insertion torque value: An analytical observational study.
Review in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Influence of Reduced Cortical Bone Compression by Implant Macrogeometry on Peri-Implant Bone Healing: An In Vitro and In Vivo Experimental Study.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Assessing primary stability is critical to predicting dental implant success, yet existing assessments often rely on subjective judgment. This study presents and validates a classification system based on the progressive insertion torque value (PITV) to provide objective, reproducible parameters for guiding prosthetic loading protocols. Material and Methods: An analytical observational study was conducted on 1,250 implant torque-curve interpretations. Primary stability was classified into three types according to final insertion torque (IT): high (50 Ncm), moderate (30 to <50 Ncm), and low (<30 Ncm). Types I and II included four PITV subtypes (A-D), while Type III included six subtypes (A-F) based on curve trajectory patterns. Twenty-five dentists were trained in curve interpretation, and intra- and inter-examiner agreement was assessed using Cohen's and Fleiss' kappa statistics and prevalence- and bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK). Predictive validity was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis (area under the curve [AUC] with 95% confidence intervals). Calibration (intercept and slope) and the Brier score were also computed. Results: Intraexaminer agreement was almost perfect in both general dentists and implant specialists (k = 0.82-0.95). Interexaminer agreement was also almost perfect (general dentists: k = 0.81; specialists: k = 0.89). Overall agreement was k = 0.84 (p < 0.001). The classification showed moderate predictive discrimination (AUC = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.56-0.81). Conclusions: The classification of primary stability based on the progressive insertion torque value in edentulous maxillary ridges showed high intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability in interpreting torque-time curves. Its clinical utility, predictive performance, and prosthetic loading thresholds were not assessed in this study and warrant prospective evaluation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.