ReviewJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2025
Cephalometric measurements and their impact on interlabial distance in individuals with and without anterior open bite: A comparative study.
Review in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There has been limited research on the relationship between bone, dentoalveolar structures, and lip sealing, with no comparative studies on individuals with anterior open bite (AOB). This research aimed to evaluate the cephalometric measurements that modify interlabial distance in individuals with and without AOB. Material and Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 110 cephalometric radiographs (55 with AOB and 55 matched controls). Eighteen cephalometric variables (9 angular and 9 linear) were measured using Blue Sky Plan 4 software (USA) by one trained and calibrated dentist. Data were analysed using SPSS version 26. Shapiro-Wilk test assessed normality; Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney test were applied accordingly. Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted to identify variables that modify interlabial distance (p<0.05). Results: In the control group, significant influences were identified for several factors: maxillomandibular divergence (B=0.03, p=0.019), upper lip height (B=0.06, p=0.032), upper lip to S-line distance (B=-0.05, p=0.024), and lower lip to S-line distance (B=0.05, p=0.047). In contrast, within the AOB group, only lower facial height had a significant influence (B=0.31, p=0.047). The final multiple linear regression analysis for the whole sample showed that AOB (B=0.703, p=0.009) and lower facial height (B=0.177, p=0.027) significantly affected the interlabial gap. Conclusions: The interlabial gap in individuals with AOB is mainly influenced by vertical facial dimension, while in controls, maxillomandibular divergence and lip-to-S-line distances play a greater role. Moreover, AOB and increased vertical facial dimension are the most influential factors affecting the interlabial gap, highlighting the need to address both during orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.