Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41716356›Full record

ArticleF1000Research2025

Multimodal Machine Learning Approach for Diagnosing Atopic Dermatitis.

Alida Widiawaty, Wresti Indriatmi, Wisnu Jatmiko, Endi Novianto, Aria Kekalih, Hendra Gunawan, Pramudita Satria Palar, Muhammad Febrian Rachmadi, Sherly Dermawan, Tengku Laras Malahayati and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F1000Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alida WidiawatyFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru, Riau, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6325-0843
Wresti IndriatmiMedical Science, Doctoral Study Program, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta Pusat, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Wisnu JatmikoFaculty of Computer Science, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, West Java, Indonesia.
Endi NoviantoDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta Pusat, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Aria KekalihOccupational Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta Pusat, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Hendra GunawanDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia.
Pramudita Satria PalarFaculty of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia.
Muhammad Febrian RachmadiFaculty of Computer Science, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, West Java, Indonesia.
Sherly DermawanFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru, Riau, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8530-662X
Tengku Laras MalahayatiFaculty of Computer Science, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, West Java, Indonesia.
Alif Wicaksana RamadhanFaculty of Computer Science, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, West Java, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a prevalent, chronic inflammatory skin disease with diverse clinical presentations, often overlapping with other dermatoses. Its diagnosis remains largely dependent on clinical expertise, leading to variability and limited diagnostic accuracy, particularly among general practitioners. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a multimodal artificial intelligence (AI) model that integrates lesion image analysis and structured anamnesis to improve AD diagnosis. Methods: This diagnostic study was conducted in two phases: Phase 1 used retrospective data from 2021-2024, and Phase 2 involved prospective external validation from multiple hospitals in 2025. Patients with AD or related skin conditions were included, with diagnoses based on AAD 2014 criteria. Multimodal fusion combined ResNet50-extracted image features and MPNet-based anamnesis text features using a late fusion model. This approach mimics clinical reasoning by integrating visual and contextual clinical information to classify cases as AD or non-AD. Results and Discussion: The multimodal AI model integrating ResNet50 (image) and MPNet (anamnesis) achieved 98.28% accuracy in classifying AD vs non-AD, outperforming image-or text-only models. It offers clinical advantages by mimicking physician reasoning, improving diagnostic consistency, reducing subjectivity, and enabling mass triage. However, real-world generalizability remains a challenge due to limited training diversity, potential language constraints (Bahasa Indonesia), and narrow differential diagnoses. External validation and explainable AI (XAI) are critical for broader application. Despite limitations, the model aligns with emerging literature, showing multimodal AI can approach or surpass expert-level performance in dermatological diagnosis when rigorously validated. Conclusions: The multimodal ResNet50-MPNet model shows near-perfect accuracy in diagnosing AD by mimicking clinician reasoning. It offers consistent, holistic assessment but requires external validation and improved interpretability for clinical adoption. Continued AI-clinician collaboration is vital to translating this promising technology into real-world dermatological care.

Indexed as

Dermatitis, AtopicMachine LearningArtificial IntelligenceHumansRetrospective StudiesAtopic dermatitisClinical decision supportDermatology diagnosisExplainable AI (XAI)Machine learningMPNetMultimodal Artificial Intelligence (AI)ResNet50

Identifiers

PMID41716356
PMCPMC12914175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.