ArticleJPRAS open2026
Cross face nerve grafting for reinnervation of nasal and tongue mucosa following trigeminal nerve injury.
Article in JPRAS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The ten test for facial sensory assessment: A scoping review.JPRAS open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Central injury to the trigeminal pathways can cause debilitating facial anesthesia, mucosal anesthesia, taste alteration and neurotrophic keratopathy, leading patients and physicians to seek treatments for these deficits. A patient presented with complete left hemifacial anesthesia and recurrent epistaxis following resection of a left posterior fossa astrocytoma. She subsequently was treated with cross-face nerve grafting using input from the contralateral unaffected trigeminal nerve branches to provide sensation to the hemitongue, nasal mucosa, cornea, and the V2 and V3 dermatomes. WEST facial set Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament testing was performed pre-operatively and at 4, 13, 18 and 24 months post-operatively, along with subjective light-touch evaluation of the nasal septum and tongue. By 3 months the patient reported subjective early signs of sensation to the tongue, teeth, buccal mucosa, and cornea but no changes in cutaneous sensation. Cutaneous sensation was returning by her 5-month post-operative review, with no subjective or objectively measurable deficit in any contralateral donor nerve distributions. Her cutaneous and mucosal sensation improved postoperatively. The cycle of recurrent epistaxis was halted. Our findings shows that deficits in hemitongue and nasal mucosal afferent innervation may be reconstructed using cross-face nerve grafts. Such procedures may be combined to address multiple deficits simultaneously.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.