Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41716325›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026

Utilizing the Style Under Stress™ tool within Crucial Conversations© methodology to stimulate veterinary students' reflective practice of communication behaviors during client interactions.

Rodney S Bagley, Amelia Mindthoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rodney S BagleyDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine at Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Amelia MindthoffOffice of Academic and Student Affairs, College of Veterinary Medicine at Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: "Crucial" conversations occur commonly in the veterinary profession and students require exposure to, and training in, these difficult communication dynamics. Methods: To introduce the concept of how people respond during perceived crucial, intense, or difficult communication dynamics, we asked first-semester veterinary students to complete a "Style Under Stress™" self-assessment offered by the Crucial Conversations© (Crucial Learning) educational platform. This tool is used in the training of the Crucial Conversations© model and provides important insight into how people may respond during crucial conversations. First-year veterinary students in the initial (fall) semester of their curriculum completed this assessment beginning in 2016 (Class of 2020) continuing annually through fall of 2024 (Class of 2028). Results: Responses were compared between classes (years) to determine student style consistency between years. Most students were assigned a "Silence" style (examples including "withdrawing," "masking," or "avoiding") and this was preserved throughout the different years. Discussion: The feedback provided through the assessment is used as a component of medical communication training in developing competency during crucial communication encounters. Students learn about their individual defaults as well as how others may respond in similar crucial conversation situations.

Indexed as

crucial conversationssilencestudent perspectivesstyle under stressviolence

Identifiers

PMID41716325
PMCPMC12913100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.