ReviewFrontiers in surgery2026
Enhanced recovery pathways improve postoperative outcomes in haemorrhoid surgery: a narrative review.
Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Haemorrhoid surgery, while typically performed as a low-risk outpatient procedure, is frequently associated with considerable postoperative discomfort, delayed return to daily activities, and occasional unplanned healthcare visits. Enhanced recovery protocols, originally developed to improve outcomes in major abdominal surgery, offer a structured, evidence-based framework for optimizing perioperative care and accelerating recovery. This review explores whether these principles can be effectively applied to the context of haemorrhoidectomy. Key components such as patient education, multimodal pain control, minimal preoperative fasting, early mobilization, and structured discharge planning are conceptually well-suited to the needs of patients undergoing benign anorectal surgery. Early clinical experiences and extrapolated data from related surgical settings suggest that even minor procedures may benefit from standardized recovery pathways, with reported reductions in postoperative pain scores of up to forty percent, faster return to function by two to three days, and nearly fifty percent fewer unplanned return visits. These findings support the potential for improved pain management, reduced variability in care, and enhanced patient satisfaction. However, current evidence remains limited, with few studies specifically addressing the impact of enhanced recovery protocols in haemorrhoidectomy. This article synthesizes the available literature, highlights potential advantages and implementation challenges, and advocates for the development of a simplified, procedure-specific perioperative pathway tailored to the characteristics of this common surgical intervention. The integration of digital follow-up tools and individualized care strategies may further support recovery and reduce complications in this setting. Overall, a targeted and pragmatic approach to enhanced recovery in haemorrhoid surgery represents a clinically meaningful opportunity to improve outcomes and modernize care delivery in proctology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.