ReviewChemical science2026
Interfacial failure mechanisms and design principles in solid-state sodium batteries.
Review in Chemical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Solid-state sodium batteries (SSSBs) have attracted increasing attention as a promising alternative for large-scale energy storage owing to their intrinsic safety, material abundance, and potential cost advantages. Significant progress has been made in developing diverse solid-state electrolytes, including polymers, inorganic ceramics, and hybrid systems, many of which exhibit impressive bulk ionic conductivity. However, the translation of these materials-level properties into durable, high-performance solid-state sodium batteries remains limited, indicating that bulk ion transport alone does not govern practical cell behavior. In this review, we adopt an interface-centered and issue-driven perspective to analyze the key challenges in SSSBs. Rather than providing a materials-category-based summary, we focus on dominant interfacial failure mechanisms and their sodium origins. Chemical and electrochemical instability, electrical blocking associated with space-charge effects and grain boundaries, mechanical degradation arising from elastic and thermal mismatch, and defect-assisted sodium dendrite penetration are discussed within a unified mechanistic framework. These interfacial processes are shown to be intrinsically coupled, collectively controlling effective ion transport, critical current density, and long-term cell stability. Building on this understanding, we critically assess why high bulk ionic conductivity has not translated into robust full-cell performance and emphasize the limitations of conductivity as a single performance metric. We further discuss general design principles for interface engineering across different electrolyte families and revisit lessons from technologically mature sodium battery systems to clarify realistic pathways toward practical implementation. By linking interfacial chemistry, defect physics, and mechanical properties, this Review aims to provide a coherent framework and forward-looking guidance for the rational design of next-generation SSSBs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.