ArticleCommunicative & integrative biology2026
Modelling the behaviour of physiological processes: On the lack of a scientific basis in medical science.
Article in Communicative & integrative biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physiological regulation is extremely complex and cannot be described by homeostasis, the mathematical model generally used in medical science. Homeostasis is based on assumptions which have never been tested or substantiated and when simulated appears not to be consistent with the real behavior of physiological regulation. As a consequence, drugs and drug treatments are developed on a trial and error basis, without a functional model guiding the process. This paper evaluates a mathematical model published previously which much better corresponds to the complex behavior of regulated physiological processes. The compensatory response - the reaction of the body's defense mechanism to disturbances - is shown to be a major factor in the effects of drugs. Its magnitude at any moment is argued not to be determined by the actual drug dose, but by the dose the organism expects. Model simulations show the compensatory response to be the primary factor in curing diseases while it can be isolated from the drug effect to cure without the side effects characteristic of drugs. If instead of homeostasis a better functioning model had enabled a real understanding of the body's defense mechanism, the compensatory response could have been a powerful tool of modern medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.