Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41716225›Full record

ArticleCommunicative & integrative biology2026

Modelling the behaviour of physiological processes: On the lack of a scientific basis in medical science.

Abraham Peper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communicative & integrative biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Abraham PeperDepartment of Biomedical Engineering & Physics , Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physiological regulation is extremely complex and cannot be described by homeostasis, the mathematical model generally used in medical science. Homeostasis is based on assumptions which have never been tested or substantiated and when simulated appears not to be consistent with the real behavior of physiological regulation. As a consequence, drugs and drug treatments are developed on a trial and error basis, without a functional model guiding the process. This paper evaluates a mathematical model published previously which much better corresponds to the complex behavior of regulated physiological processes. The compensatory response - the reaction of the body's defense mechanism to disturbances - is shown to be a major factor in the effects of drugs. Its magnitude at any moment is argued not to be determined by the actual drug dose, but by the dose the organism expects. Model simulations show the compensatory response to be the primary factor in curing diseases while it can be isolated from the drug effect to cure without the side effects characteristic of drugs. If instead of homeostasis a better functioning model had enabled a real understanding of the body's defense mechanism, the compensatory response could have been a powerful tool of modern medicine.

Indexed as

adaptationcompensatory responsedrug dosedrug effectdrug tolerancefeedbackhomeopathyhomeostasismathematical modelphysiological regulationside effects

Identifiers

PMID41716225
PMCPMC12915846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.