ArticleJHLT open2026
Rescuing lung transplant candidates with rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease who fail V-V ECMO: A case series of dual veno-arterial and veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuits.
Article in JHLT open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Providing adequate, awake and ambulatory mechanical circulatory support to patients with rapidly progressive advanced intersitial lung disease (ILD) remains challenging. In a subset of ILD patients with refractory hypoxemia or hemodynamic instability, despite optimal veno-venous (V-V) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support, the addition of a veno-arterial (V-A) ECMO circuit may avoid the need for mechanical ventilation and protect against right ventricular dysfunction and subsequent end-organ dysfunction. Methods: We herein report the first case series of three patients with ILD who received dual VV-VA ECMO support as a bridge to transplantation. Results: All patients survived until lung transplantation 2 to 8 days after V-A ECMO initiation and had an unremarkable post-transplant recovery. Conclusion: Although the addition a second ECMO circuit is a complex and resource-intensive strategy, it is a feasible approach to stabilze a subset of ILD patients who are indequately supported with V-V ECMO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.