Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41716215›Full record

ArticleTechnical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology2026

Simulation and optimization of treatment schedule for multi-gantry heavy ion therapy.

Ethan Stolen, Sridhar Yaddanapudi, Helen Qian, Sang Kyun Yoo, Bo Lu, Justin C Park, Jun Tan, Xiaoying Liang, Keith M Furutani, Chris J Beltran and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ethan StolenDepartment of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Sridhar YaddanapudiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Helen QianDepartment of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Sang Kyun YooDepartment of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Bo LuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Justin C ParkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Jun TanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Xiaoying LiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Keith M FurutaniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Chris J BeltranDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
James J SohnDepartment of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) facilities face scheduling challenges due to multiple treatment rooms sharing a single synchrotron, leading to extended patient wait times and reduced efficiency. This study developed and evaluated an optimization tool for patient scheduling in multi-gantry CIRT facilities to minimize in-room patient wait time and maximize patient throughput. Methods: A simulation-optimization model was created to emulate patient flow in a facility with one fixed-beam and three gantry rooms. We developed a genetic algorithm (GA) to balance competing objectives like wait times, room utilization, and treatment priority. Its performance was evaluated against baseline scheduling and a Bayesian optimization (BO) approach, using metrics of average in-room wait time and algorithm execution speed. Robustness was tested across various scenarios, including equipment downtime. Results: The GA reduced average patient wait times by 17% (from 0.47 to 0.39 min) compared to baseline. BO performed significantly better, achieving a 92% reduction (to 0.04 min). While GA converged faster (3 min), BO required more iterations to converge, thereby taking longer (7 min), but achieving much greater reduction in average patient wait times. In 100 independent test scenarios, the BO approach significantly reduced wait times in 100% of the simulations, compared to 19% for the GA. Both algorithms maintained robust performance across diverse conditions, demonstrating their reliability. Analysis of outliers (N = 100) showed that BO significantly reduced the maximum patient wait time from 3.52 to 1.33 min (p < 0.001), minimizing clinically relevant extremes. Conclusion: This application of scheduling optimization to the unique constraints of CIRT shows potential for improving efficiency at CIRT facilities. While requiring minutes rather than seconds to converge, the BO algorithm effectively eliminates immobilized wait times, making it a powerful tool for daily schedule optimization. Future research will focus on validation with empirical data from operational CIRT centers.

Indexed as

Bayesian optimizationCarbon ion radiotherapyHeavy ion therapySchedule optimization

Identifiers

PMID41716215
PMCPMC12914664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.