ReviewDigital biomarkers
Facial Expression and Predicting and Monitoring Response to Depression Treatment: A Systematic Review.
Review in Digital biomarkers. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The identification of biomarkers for treatment response in major depression is critical to the further development of personalized treatment. There is a recognized relationship between facial expression and depression of mood, and previous literature also indicates that facial expression is associated with treatment outcomes in depression. This suggests that facial expression may have use as a biomarker for treatment response. There is no previous synthesis of related research to drive the development of new digital approaches. Methods: We conducted a systematic review using three databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, and PsycINFO), identifying English-language publications (journal articles or books) that assessed either facial muscle activity or expression as predictors of treatment response or correlates of treatment outcome in depression. Risk of bias was assessed using a National Institutes of Health quality assessment tool. Results: We identified 12 studies, involving a total of 389 participants, which used a variety of different assessment methods and thus assessment outcomes, including electromyography, observer-related assessments (including Facial Action Coding System), and automated tools of facial expression assessment. Depression treatment response correlated with an increase in facial expressivity. Greater activity in the corrugator and zygomatic muscles, and lower levels of lip tightening and downward lip movement, may predict treatment response. Conclusions: Included studies were limited by heterogeneity in facial expression assessment tools and outcomes, along with demographic homogeneity. The findings of the review suggest that facial expression analysis may offer an avenue for biomarkers of depression status and treatment response prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.