ArticleVeterinary world2025
Molecular characterization and high prevalence of
Article in Veterinary world, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Bovine trichomonosis, caused by Materials and Methods: A total of 239 sheath wash samples were collected between June 2018 and October 2020. Of these, 51 culture-positive trichomonad isolates were selected for molecular analysis. Microscopy and modified Giemsa staining were used to characterize protozoal morphology. DNA was extracted and subjected to RT-PCR with 5' TaqMan™ probes, as well as conventional PCR targeting the 5.8S rRNA/Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) regions. PCR amplicons were sequenced, and phylogenetic trees were constructed using MEGA (maximum-likelihood, 1,000 bootstrap replicates). Statistical comparisons between diagnostic methods were performed using Chi-square and Cochran's Q test. Results: RT-PCR detected Conclusion: This study confirms a high prevalence of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.