Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41716151›Full record

ArticleVeterinary world2025

Comparative effects of corn, wheat, and barley diets on broiler growth performance, carcass traits, meat quality, and consumer sensory evaluation.

Patcharawan Kongkasem, Choawit Rakangthong, Phongthorn Kongman, Sombat Prasongsook, Kasama Sudtilak, Theerawit Poeikhampha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary world, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Patcharawan KongkasemDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Choawit RakangthongDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Phongthorn KongmanDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sombat PrasongsookDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kasama SudtilakDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Theerawit PoeikhamphaDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aim: Corn is the main cereal used in broiler nutrition because of its high energy content and carotenoid richness, while wheat and barley offer alternative nutrient profiles that may increase production flexibility. However, their relative impacts on broiler performance, carcass traits, meat physicochemical properties, and consumer sensory perception under standardized enzyme-supplemented conditions remain unclear. This study examined the effects of partially replacing corn with wheat or barley on growth performance, carcass yield, meat quality, and consumer sensory evaluation in broiler chickens. Materials and Methods: A total of 525 male ROSS 308 broilers were randomly assigned to three dietary treatments: corn (C), corn-wheat (CW), and corn-barley (CB), with five replicates of 35 birds each. Diets were isocaloric and isonitrogenous and supplemented with a xylanase-β-glucanase complex. Birds were raised for 35 days under controlled environmental conditions. Growth performance, carcass traits, meat color (L*, a*, b*), pH, water-holding capacity, texture profile, and consumer sensory attributes were evaluated using standardized protocols. Data were analyzed using General Linear Model procedures with significance set at p < 0.05. Results: Broilers fed with corn showed numerically higher body weight gain (+4.8% compared to CW; +4.4% compared to CB) and a tendency toward improved feed conversion ratio (1.52 vs. 1.56-1.58; p = 0.10). Including barley significantly increased abdominal fat (+36% vs. corn; p = 0.04), while wheat resulted in the lowest fat deposition. Meat yellowness (b*) was highest in the corn group at both 45 min and 24 h postmortem (p < 0.05, p < 0.01), reflecting the higher carotenoid content of corn. No significant differences were found among treatments for pH, drip loss, cooking and thawing loss, texture parameters, or sensory scores (p > 0.05). All sensory attributes scored above 4.3 on the 7-point scale. Conclusion: Moderate inclusion of wheat (12%-20%) or barley (8%-15%) in enzyme-supplemented diets did not affect growth performance, carcass yield, meat physicochemical traits, or consumer sensory acceptance. Wheat might be used strategically to reduce abdominal fat, while corn remains preferred when enhanced yellowness is desired. These findings support the practical use of wheat and barley as viable alternatives to corn in commercial broiler feeding programs.

Indexed as

barleybroilercarcass qualityconsumer sensory evaluationcorngrowth performancemeat qualitywheat

Identifiers

PMID41716151
PMCPMC12913878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.