ArticleInternational journal of technology assessment in health care2026
Developing an assessment tool to measure health equity considerations of guideline development handbooks.
Article in International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesGuideline development handbooks outline the methodology that authoring organizations use to create public health and clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). We created an Equity Assessment Tool (EquAT) for guideline development handbooks to identify areas of improvement and foster conversations.
methodsSequential phases lead to tool development and face/content validation in this mixed-methods study. In phase 1, we reviewed the literature to generate a list of "essential elements" or tasks that are part of guideline development methodology, mapped "essential elements" with relevant equity concepts, and drafted our tool for use in reviewing guideline development handbooks. In phase 2, we surveyed experts for feedback on "essential elements" and explicit language for assessing equity within the tool and refined items. We piloted and finalized the tool based on feedback.
resultsWe identified 18 essential elements within five domains of guideline development and created a draft EquAT. Twenty of 25 invited experts responded to the online survey for feedback on the tool. Most experts provided limited feedback, and the most common suggestion was adding clarifying language to the existing tool criteria for assessing equity. Ten experts participated in pilot testing the revised tool. We found a diversity of scores, and potential reasons might be due to the complexity of the tool, differences in equity frameworks, and a variety of expertise. We incorporated their feedback and finalized the tool.
conclusionsWe developed and validated the EquAT, a tool to foster discussion among assessors about the extent of health equity considerations in guideline development handbooks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.