ArticleCurrent medical imaging2026
Impact of Contrast Agent Viscosity and Fallopian Tube Inner Diameter on Tubal Visualization in MR Hysterosalpingography: A Phantom Study
Article in Current medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMR-HSG offers radiation-free multiplanar visualization for evaluating fallopian tube patency, but persistent challenges in achieving consistent high-quality visualization, particularly in smaller-diameter segments, limit clinical adoption. Previous studies modifying contrast viscosity achieved only partial improvements. This study aimed to use standardized phantom models simulating the female pelvis to systematically explore factors affecting MR-HSG image quality and provide evidence-based guidance for protocol optimization.
methodNine standardized phantoms were constructed using agar gel with embedded tubes of three inner diameters (4mm, 2mm, and 1.4mm) representing ampullary, isthmic, and interstitial segments. Three contrast agents with different viscosities were tested: gadolinium-saline (2.6 mPa·s), gadolinium-iopromide (7.9 mPa·s), and gadolinium-iodixanol (8.7 mPa·s) at 37°C. T1-weighted 3D-mDIXON sequences with keyhole technology were employed on a 1.5T MRI scanner. Signal intensity measurements and qualitative assessment (good/fair/poor) were performed by blinded evaluators.
resultsNo significant differences in signal intensity were found between contrast agents of different viscosities (P>0.05). However, tube diameter significantly affected imaging quality (P<0.001). The 4 mm tubes showed the highest SI (5554.49±1042) with 100% good imaging, the 2 mm tubes showed intermediate SI (733.65±78.76) with 100% fair imaging, and the 1.4 mm tubes showed the lowest SI (444.55±34.70) with 100% poor imaging across all contrast agents. DISCUSSION: Fallopian tube inner diameter is the primary determinant of MR-HSG imaging quality, while contrast agent viscosity (within 2.6-8.7 mPa·s range) shows no significant effect under controlled conditions. This study provides foundational data for understanding physical factors affecting MRHSG quality and suggests that anatomical factors may be more critical than contrast properties for clinical protocol optimization, potentially reducing procedure costs while maintaining diagnostic quality.
conclusionOptimizing spatial resolution to minimize partial volume effects may be more beneficial than modifying contrast agent properties for improving visualization of narrow fallopian tube segments. Clinical validation studies are warranted to confirm these findings in the complex in vivo environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.