Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41716046›Full record

ReviewChemMedChem2026

Direct-to-Biology: Streamlining the Path From Chemistry to Biology in Drug Discovery.

Ariane F Hübner, Fabian Barthels

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ChemMedChem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Early-stage drug discovery in a new-generation ultrahigh-throughput mass spectrometry platform.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ariane F HübnerInstitute of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences (IPBS), Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.
Fabian BarthelsInstitute of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences (IPBS), Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7950-2158

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Direct-to-biology (D2B) has emerged as a transformative concept in early drug discovery, defined by the direct on-target screening of crude reaction mixtures without prior purification. First coined in 2021, the approach builds on advances in nanoscale synthesis platforms and was shaped by seminal studies that demonstrated the feasibility of plate-based microscale chemistry for library generation. Today, D2B is increasingly adopted in academia and industry, with campaigns exploring diverse reaction classes, targeting modalities, and assay platforms. Thus, very recently, the first commercial providers now offer D2B services for ligand optimization, further driving adoption. Yet, despite clear advantages in speed, cost, and sustainability, D2B also faces limitations from assay interference and technical constraints in reaction miniaturization. Looking ahead, integration with AI-driven design and high-content biology promises to expand the scope of D2B and position it as a robust complement to traditional discovery paradigms.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoverySmall Molecule LibrariesCombinatorial Chemistry TechniquesHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansLigandsLigandsSmall Molecule Librariescombinatorial chemistrydirect‐to‐biologydrug discoveryhigh‐throughput screeningnanomole synthesis

Identifiers

PMID41716046
PMCPMC12921466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.