ArticleRisk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis2026
Risk-Resilience Feedback to Assure Critical Societal Functions.
Article in Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Risk-Resilience Feedback to Assure Critical Societal Functions.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Increase in compound natural and man-made extreme events, and growing interconnectedness of critical societal functions emphasize further understanding of interactions between elements of risk and resilience. While conceptual frameworks have mapped quantified risks to the failure of critical societal functions, feedback from failure and recovery pathways to management of risk has not been systematically considered yet. In this brief perspective, we revisit the risk-resilience feedback paradigm in the context of connected critical societal functions and discuss its role in advancing science-informed disaster policy development. Specifically, we focus on connecting robustness and recovery elements of resilience to the management of risk elements, including threat, vulnerability, and consequence. Furthermore, we briefly describe a notional networked supply chain system example to illustrate how robustness and recovery measures can inform elements of risk. Understanding interactions between elements of risk and resilience is not a fully solved problem. Extending these concepts in the context of connected natural-built-human systems subject to compound and cascading risks is an open challenge. This discussion represents steps toward addressing these challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.