ReviewScandinavian journal of caring sciences2026
Sexuality, a Fundamental Care Need-Theoretical and Clinical Considerations, a Discursive Paper.
Review in Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSexuality is a crucial component of quality of life yet often remains an under-recognised and overlooked patient need within nursing care. Despite patients expressing a desire to discuss their sexuality with nurses, significant barriers hinder these conversations, leading to unmet needs and potential negative impacts on well-being.
aimThis discursive paper aims to discuss how the Fundamentals of Care (FoC) framework can support nurses in acknowledging and addressing sexuality as a fundamental aspect of patient care.
methodA broad, structured literature search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL and Embase (2010-2026) focusing on sexuality, fundamental care needs, nursing theories and the nurse's role in addressing sexual dysfunction. The findings were critically reflected upon using the FoC framework as a lens for understanding and improving practice.
findingsThe analysis reveals that the FoC framework's emphasis on relationship, integration of care and context can facilitate a more holistic and patient-centred approach to addressing sexuality. Integrating the PLISSIT model (Permission, Limited Information, Specific Suggestions, Intensive Therapy) alongside the FoC framework provides a structured approach to initiating conversations and offering support. Organisational support, clear guidelines and adequate nurse education are also critical for overcoming barriers and fostering a culture where sexuality is openly addressed.
conclusionUtilising the FoC framework, supplemented by the PLISSIT model and a supportive organisational context, can empower nurses to acknowledge and address patients' sexual needs, ultimately improving their overall well-being and breaking down the 'two-way taboo' surrounding sexuality in healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.