ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2026
The More Than Words® parent-delivered program for autistic children and those with social communication challenges: a single-arm pragmatic feasibility trial.
Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The More Than Words® Parent-Delivered Program for Autistic Children and Those with Social Communication Challenges: a Single Arm Pragmatic Feasibility Trial
The More Than Words® Program for Parents of Young Children With Social Communication Challenges: A Pilot Pragmatic Randomized Waitlist-Control Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPediatric speech-language pathologists (SLPs) frequently use parent coaching interventions such as the More Than Words® (MTW) program to support young autistic children and others with social communication challenges. While some promising evidence exists for MTW, outcomes from previous studies have been mixed and research to date has primarily been conducted in controlled settings, limiting generalizability to real-world practice. To support future pragmatic randomized controlled trials (RCTs), this study aimed to assess the feasibility of a MTW evaluation protocol that had been co-constructed by researchers, program developers, and expert SLPs for use in community settings.
methodsThis pragmatic, single-arm, pre-post feasibility study implemented the co-constructed evaluation protocol during MTW programs delivered by community-based SLPs as a part of standard care in a publicly funded service. We assessed the following dimensions of methodological feasibility: (a) recruitment capability; (b) feasibility, acceptability, and practicality of data collection and analysis procedures; and (c) preliminary outcome trends.
resultsOf those approached, 45% of SLPs and 57% of parent-child dyads agreed to participate. Four of the five enrolled SLPs delivered their MTW program as planned and none of the 21 enrolled parent-child dyads withdrew from the study. Outcome measure completion ranged from 48 to 81%, with 4 dyads providing little to no data. SLPs viewed study methods and measures as acceptable and feasible and researcher coding of video-recorded outcome measures was reliable and practical. Preliminary outcome trend analyses indicated post-program gains in children's early communication skills and communicative participation by parent report, and in child, parent, and dyadic interaction behaviors coded by the researchers. All parents agreed or strongly agreed that their child benefited from the MTW program and most reported increased self-efficacy in supporting their child's communication.
conclusionsThis feasibility trial offers a valuable contribution to advancing pragmatic clinical trial methods for use with MTW and other similar programs, highlighting both the challenges and benefits of moving beyond controlled experimental settings. Although findings may not fully generalize, new insights into participant recruitment, data collection, and methodological feasibility are applicable more broadly and can inform future pragmatic RCT development for evaluating effectiveness of community-based caregiver-delivered programs.
trial registrationThe trial was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT06847347).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.