ArticleArthritis research & therapy2026
Prevalence and clinical relevance of systematically tested antimitochondrial antibodies in systemic sclerosis.
Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAntimitochondrial antibodies (AMA), the hallmark of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), have been inconsistently reported and poorly characterized in systemic sclerosis (SSc). Although recently linked to subclinical dysmotility in a cohort enriched for gastrointestinal (GI) involvement, data on the prevalence and clinical relevance of AMA in real-life SSc cohorts remain limited.
methodsA retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on consecutive SSc patients followed at a referral center for the disease. Patients were tested for serum AMA according to reference standards, including HEp-2 immunofluorescent screening and ELISA confirmation (anti-E2 pyruvate dehydrogenase). Patients’ features were compared between AMA-positive and -negative cases.
resultsAmong 165 SSc patients (20% diffuse cutaneous disease, 33% interstitial lung disease, 7.3% pulmonary arterial hypertension; 51% positive for anticentromere antibodies, 29% anti-topoisomerase I, 12% anti-RNA polymerase III), 37 (22%) were AMA-positive. While strongly associated with PBC, AMA were not linked to significant differences in cutaneous, vascular, pulmonary, or myocardial involvement. However, AMA were associated with GI vascular involvement (OR 13.3, 95% CI 2.53–95.0; p = 0.002), including gastric antral vascular ectasia (OR 7.99, 95% CI 1.05–72.5; p = 0.045), independently from PBC or symptoms of SSc-GI involvement. These complications are clinically relevant, as they may lead to GI bleeding and refractory iron-deficiency anemia.
conclusionIn our cohort of SSc patients systematically screened for autoantibodies, we found a high prevalence of AMA and identified a novel putative association with GI vascular involvement, which warrants confirmation in independent studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.