ReviewConflict and health2026
Trauma-informed peacebuilding: a systematic mapping review of training programs.
Review in Conflict and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe psychosocial consequences of conflict and trauma exposure place a significant burden on individuals, communities, and on the social fabric essential for rebuilding peace. There is growing recognition of the need to integrate trauma-informed approaches into peacebuilding efforts. However, little is known about how practitioners are being equipped for this work, what training programs exist, and what core components they include.
methodsThis systematic mapping review aims to systematically map and characterize existing training programs on trauma-informed peacebuilding, specifically examining their core components and implementation modalities. An initial systematic search of bibliographic databases (Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed) yielded no relevant results. Therefore, a systematic web search of non-bibliographic material was conducted in line with Cochrane's guidelines. A total of 2,400 results were screened, and 21 relevant training initiatives were included.
resultsThe review identified 15 facilitated and six non-facilitated programs. Training providers were primarily non-governmental organizations based in high-income Western countries, with half of all programs originating in the United States. Thematic analysis of training contents revealed seven core components: (1) defining and conceptualizing trauma, (2) realizing the impact of trauma on peace and peacebuilding efforts, (3) self-care and resilience strategies for peace practitioners, (4) psychosocial support skills to address trauma and foster resilience in communities, (5) integrating trauma-informed practices into programs and organizations, (6) ethical considerations, and (7) cultural competence and contextual awareness. DISCUSSION: Despite increasing demand, training efforts in trauma-informed peacebuilding remain fragmented, unevenly distributed, and unevaluated. This review highlights the need for more accessible, contextually relevant, and evidence-informed training initiatives. Recommendations are provided to guide future training development and inform policy and practice aimed at strengthening trauma-informed capacities in peacebuilding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.