ReviewKnee surgery & related research2026
Return to sport after ACL reconstruction, meniscus and cartilage surgeries in professional soccer players: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Knee surgery & related research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate and compare the effects of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), meniscal surgeries, and cartilage surgeries on return to sport (RTS) outcomes in professional soccer players. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe methodology followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. An electronic database search was performed to identify potentially relevant research articles. Four different outcome measures (age at surgery, return to sport, time to return to sport, level of return to sport) were extracted and meta-analyzed from all included studies and compared from three different groups (ACLR, cartilage surgeries, meniscus surgeries).
resultsThe pooled meta-analysis showed no difference in age at surgery among groups (p > 0.05). The overall pooled return-to-sport rate was 90% (95% CI 93.3-95.9), with no significant differences between ACL reconstruction, meniscus surgeries, and cartilage surgeries (p > 0.05) Patients treated for ACLR reported a longer time (p < 0.05) to return to sport (258.05 days; 95% CI 230.48-288.93) compared with meniscus (41.11 days; 95% CI 30.22-55.93) and cartilage surgeries (135.0 days; 95% CI 130.54-139.61). Furthermore, the pooled meta-analysis showed that athletes who underwent meniscus surgeries had a higher (p < 0.05) percentage of return to sport (100%: 95% CI 86.0-100.0) compared with ACLR (80.0%; 95% CI 67.5-90.3) and cartilage treatment (94.5%; 64.2-100.0).
conclusionsFor professional soccer players, ACL reconstruction, meniscus surgeries, and cartilage surgeries demonstrated a favorable RTP rate of around 90%. Nevertheless, the analysis of the level of RTS and the time to RTS was constrained by limited evidence, precluding a more objective conclusion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Meta-analysis of studies of Level IV. STUDY REGISTRATION: PROSPERO Registry (CRD420251074362).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.