ArticleBMC chemistry2026
The first validated HPLC method with UV detection for concurrent assay of lidocaine and fluorescein in their co-formulated ophthalmic solution.
Article in BMC chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A simple, fast, and eco-friendly high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) method has been developed for the concurrent quantification of lidocaine and fluorescein, employing ultraviolet detection at a wavelength of 220 nm. The chromatographic separation was applied under isocratic conditions on an Inertsil© C18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 3.5 μm particle size), utilizing a mobile phase consisting of acetonitrile and water containing 0.3% triethylamine (adjusted to pH 3.5) in a volumetric ratio of 75:25%v/v. The analysis was performed at a constant flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. Method validation was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of International Council for Harmonisation (ICH), confirming that the procedure is accurate, precise, robust, and exhibits linearity within the concentration ranges of 20–280 µg mL− 1 for lidocaine and 1–20 µg mL− 1 for fluorescein. The detection limits were determined to be 5.27 µg mL− 1 for lidocaine and 0.29 µg mL− 1 for fluorescein, while the quantitation limits were 15.97 µg mL− 1 and 0.88 µg mL− 1, respectively. This analytical method was effectively applied to quantify both compounds in a combined ophthalmic formulation, yielding mean recovery values of 100.80 ± 0.67% for lidocaine and 100.13 ± 0.99% for fluorescein, thereby demonstrating its suitability for routine quality control purposes. The environmental impact of the proposed method was evaluated using Analytical Eco-Scale, GAPI, and AGREE tools, yielding an Eco-Scale score 78 and an AGREE score of 0.63, indicating acceptable greenness based on quantitative assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.