Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41715125›Full record

ReviewChinese medicine2026

Tuning and clinical application of large language models in Traditional Chinese Medicine: scoping review.

Changxiao Han, Guangyi Yang, Hongtao Li, Liguo Zhu, Minshan Feng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chinese medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Changxiao Han *Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100102, China.
Guangyi Yang *Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China.
Hongtao Li *Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100102, China.
Liguo ZhuWangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100102, China. zhlg95@aliyun.com.
Minshan FengWangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100102, China. drfengminshan@163.com.

Funding

Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission AI + Health Collaborative Innovation Cultivation Project Z221100003522009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveLarge Language Models (LLMs) show significant potential in healthcare, but their application in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) lacks systematic evaluation. This study aims to comprehensively review LLMs tuning techniques, data construction strategies, evaluation methods, and application scenarios in TCM clinical practice.

methodsA scoping review following PRISMA-ScR guidelines was conducted. Researchers systematically searched seven databases for relevant studies published between database inception to May 2025. The analysis focused on identifying model characteristics, tuning techniques, data sources, evaluation methods, application domains and performance limitations to assess the current state and future directions of TCM-oriented LLMs.

resultsWe included 27 studies (21 in English, 6 in Chinese). Application domains comprised TCM knowledge consultation (10 studies) and diagnostic assistance (13 studies), with 4 studies establishing TCM LLMs evaluation benchmarks. LoRA fine-tuning was most widely used (65.2%), often combined with prompt engineering (47.8%), continued pre-training (43.5%), and retrieval-augmented generation (39.1%). Most studies (87.0%) employed multiple technique combinations. Training data balanced theoretical knowledge (classics) with clinical experience (case records), though multimodal data remained severely insufficient. Evaluation methods were multidimensional, with accuracy (63.0%) and human assessment (77.8%) most frequently used. Specialized TCM evaluation benchmarks were gradually established. Current models excel at integrating heterogeneous knowledge, basic syndrome differentiation reasoning, and cross-language knowledge conversion, but show limitations in simulating complex TCM reasoning processes and individualized diagnosis.

conclusionAlthough TCM-oriented LLMs demonstrate effectiveness in knowledge consultation and diagnostic tasks, they face significant challenges in capturing TCM's holistic paradigm, data quality, and clinical evaluation. Future research should develop TCM-compatible model architectures, build standardized multimodal data ecosystems, strengthen clinical translation, and create evaluation frameworks that reflect TCM's diagnostic process.

Indexed as

BenchmarkClinical applicationLarge language modelsScoping reviewTraditional Chinese Medicine

Identifiers

PMID41715125
PMCPMC12922203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.