Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41715111›Full record

ArticleBioData mining2026

KeySDL: sparse dictionary learning for keystone microbe identification from steady-state observations using a dynamical-systems model.

Max Gordon, Turgut Yigit Akyol, B Amos, Stig U Andersen, Cranos Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioData mining, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Max GordonDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, North Carolina State University, 890 Oval Drive, Raleigh, NC, 27607, USA.
Turgut Yigit AkyolDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Universitetsbyen 81, Aarhus C, 8000, Denmark.
B AmosDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, North Carolina State University, 890 Oval Drive, Raleigh, NC, 27607, USA.
Stig U AndersenDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Universitetsbyen 81, Aarhus C, 8000, Denmark.
Cranos WilliamsDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, North Carolina State University, 890 Oval Drive, Raleigh, NC, 27607, USA. cmwilli5@ncsu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentification of microbes with large impacts on their microbial communities, known as keystone microbes, is a topic of long-standing interest in microbiome research. However, many approaches to identify keystone microbes are limited by the inherent nonlinearity and state-dependence of microbial dynamics. Machine learning approaches have been applied to address these shortcomings but often require more data than is available for a given microbial system.

resultsWe propose a keystone identification approach called KeySDL which reduces the amount of data required by incorporating assumptions about the type of microbial dynamics present in the experimental system. The data are modeled as originating from a Generalized Lotka-Volterra (GLV) model, an architecture commonly used to simulate microbial systems. The parameters of this model are then estimated using Sparse Dictionary Learning (SDL).We also propose a self-consistency score to help evaluate whether the assumption of GLV dynamics is reasonable for a given dataset, either through the application of KeySDL or other analysis tools validated using GLV simulation.

conclusionCompared to existing methods, this approach allows accurate prediction of keystone microbes from small numbers of samples and provides an output interpretable as reconstructed system dynamics.

Indexed as

Keystone microbesMicrobiome modelingSparse dictionary learningSystems identification

Identifiers

PMID41715111
PMCPMC12922210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.