ArticleBMC health services research2026
Barriers and facilitators to implementing digital psychosocial interventions for older adults presenting to emergency departments: a scoping review.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlobally, we are experiencing an ageing population. In high-income countries, many individuals aged over 60 years live with at least one chronic condition. Among older people, certain psychosocial factors are associated with increased risk of experiencing an emergency department (ED) presentation. These presentations may have negative physical and psychological outcomes for individuals and place additional burdens on health resources. The implementation of digital psychosocial interventions could help create age-friendly EDs and improve holistic healthcare provision, reduce re-presentations and better address the challenges faced by older adults. This scoping review aimed to identify and synthesise the barriers and facilitators to implementing digital psychosocial interventions designed for older adults to assess or manage non-primary psychosocial complaints in ED.
methodsFour databases and Google Scholar were searched for experimental, observational and qualitative peer-reviewed studies or grey literature published in English. Papers were considered for inclusion if they described the perspectives of key stakeholders (older adults, family, or healthcare providers) on the implementation of digital psychosocial interventions designed for older adults in emergency settings. Study selection and data extraction were performed in duplicate, with the Theoretical Domains Framework used to synthesise barriers and facilitators.
resultsEight papers from four countries met the eligibility criteria. They employed qualitative and/or quantitative methods and reported on digital interventions addressing various psychosocial needs. Older adults identified the highest number of barriers and facilitators, followed by healthcare providers, with families and caregivers reporting the fewest. The barriers recognised by older adults included a lack of technological skills and a fear or aversion to technology, while facilitators were improved privacy and designing digital psychosocial interventions to enhance user experience. Healthcare professionals faced barriers due to ED’s demanding environment and heavy workloads. However, supportive leadership was noted as a facilitator for implementation. Families and caregivers were the least involved stakeholders, resulting in very few barriers or facilitators being identified in this group.
conclusionsThe barriers and facilitators identified in this review highlight that there is promising evidence to support the implementation of digital psychosocial interventions that are co-designed with older adults, families and clinicians to improve care and reduce workloads.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.