ArticleBMC health services research2026
Implementing a rapid analysis framework to evaluate wellness initiatives in Massachusetts federally qualified health centers.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionHigh patient volume and acuity introduce heightened strains on healthcare services, which increases the risk of healthcare staff burnout. The Massachusetts League of Community Health Centers (Mass League) and researchers from Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) partnered to create Be Well Together (BWT), funded by the Health Resources and Services Administration, with the goal of assessing the workforce wellness culture and impact of burnout in four Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) in Massachusetts.
objectiveDescribe the rapid analysis framework developed by the BWT team to analyze baseline and follow-up listening sessions with health center leadership and managers.
methodsTen baseline listening sessions and eight follow-up listening sessions were conducted at the beginning and end of the grant period to discuss workforce wellness themes such as burnout, access to wellness resources, and use of resources. The BWT team developed a rapid analysis framework to qualitatively code the interviews and analyze the current states of workforce wellness at the FQHCs.
resultsAudio recordings of the sessions were transcribed, and then the team used the six-step BWT rapid analysis process to identify qualitative codes. Summaries of the data were presented to each site's champions and/or leadership in site-specific and aggregate formats. DISCUSSION: Rapid analysis is an effective method to prepare information for dissemination efficiently. This framework allowed the BWT team to draw comparisons over a three-year study and can be used in future multi-group studies when conducting qualitative interviews over a longitudinal period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.