ArticleBMC health services research2026
Longer-term impacts of flooding on Australian health systems: insights from medical students on rural clinical placement.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo explore the perspectives of medical students in diverse clinical settings to enhance understanding of the sustained, system-wide effects of flooding on health systems.
designA qualitative descriptive study using interviews and focus groups (17 April − 12 May 2023). Data were first analysed using inductive content analysis, and an analytical framework was then developed through an iterative process. The analysis and interpretation were refined with input from co-authors, including clinicians based in the region during and after the flooding events.
settingRural area of the Northern Rivers region, New South Wales, Australia, 14 months after major river flooding in 2022.
participantsMedical students undertaking rural clinical placements who were in the region after the flooding event.
resultsOf the 39 students in the cohort, 32 (82%) participated. Four key domains of ongoing impact were identified: community, health services, clinicians, and broader social and physical environments. Ten categories emerged, highlighting the breadth of ongoing impacts. These included community psychological trauma, disruptions to health services, staffing challenges, and delays in patient discharge. Significant psychological impacts on healthcare workers were observed, with burnout affecting the delivery of medical education. Displacement was found to limit both access to healthcare and broader health outcomes. Additionally, the floods disproportionately affected socially vulnerable groups, and delays in government housing support contributed to ongoing stress within affected communities.
conclusionOur findings demonstrated that catastrophic flooding disrupted health service delivery and community wellbeing, with impacts including psychological trauma, workforce strain, displacement, and disproportionate effects on socially vulnerable groups, as well as consequences for medical education. They highlight the importance of supporting medical students to reflect on and learn from these experiences. The analytical framework developed, grounded in student perspectives and consistent with clinician experiences, contributes to the foundation for future research, intervention design, and preparedness planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.