SynthesisBMC palliative care2026
Family members' experiences of palliative sedation -a systematic integrative review.
Synthesis in BMC palliative care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPalliative care means care in the event of an incurable illness where the intention is to alleviate suffering and promote quality of life. In cases where the symptoms cannot be fully alleviated, palliative sedation may be required which is a lowering of consciousness in patients using medication to alleviate their suffering.
aimThe aim of this systematic integrative literature review was to describe how palliative sedation for patients at the end of life is experienced by their family members.
methodA systematic integrative review as described by Whittemore and Knafl was performed using three databases; CINAHL, PubMed and APA PsychInfo. Eleven peer-reviewed studies published between 2005 and 2025 met the inclusion criteria. They described family members’ firsthand experiences with ethical considerations clearly stated and were not excluded for including participants under 18, being review articles, or being published in a language other than English.
resultsIn total, the eleven studies comprised 1061 family members. Three of the studies came from Japan, two from the Netherlands, two more from the Netherlands, Belgium and UK and one from Belgium, Israel, Switzerland and Taiwan, respectively. Seven studies used quantitative methods, and four used qualitative methods. The results demonstrate how family members of a seriously ill person experience palliative sedation and are organized into eight categories: Affects the lifespan, Creates anxiety, Emphasizes importance of communication, Facilitates a good death, Highlights significance of participation, Impacts time and timing, Provides a chance for farewell and Relieves suffering. It was found that many family members of patients who received palliative sedation suffered. The suffering worsened the longer the sedation lasted. Palliative sedation also provided possibilities for a good death and farewell even though it was found to affect the life span. Clear information about what to expect and a good relationship with the healthcare staff was crucial.
conclusionThe well-being of family members was affected while the patients received palliative sedation, and they felt worse the longer the sedation lasted. Consistent information from the healthcare staff was of great importance. The lack of international guidelines and registries contributes to ambiguity regarding the definition and prevalence of palliative sedation in published articles, thereby limiting the scope of comparative research. Nevertheless, palliative sedation constitutes an important component of palliative care, underscoring the need for further studies, including examinations of cultural and religious influences on family members’ experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.