ReviewBMC neurology2026
'Carotid spells' - transient focal neurological episodes associated with convexity subarachnoid haemorrhage in severe ipsilateral extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis: a case report and concise literature review.
Review in BMC neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConvexity subarachnoid haemorrhage (cSAH) is most frequently caused by cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), often presenting with transient focal neurological episodes (TFNEs, a.k.a. amyloid spells). In younger patients, posterior reversible encephalopathy, reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome, and sinus thrombosis are the most frequent aetiologies. Reports on extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis-associated cSAHs are exceptional. CASE PRESENTATION: A 46-year-old female with a history of heavy smoking presented with repetitive stereotypical right-sided sensory TFNEs. An acute cranial computed tomography revealed multi-lobar left hemispheric cSAHs. The angiography demonstrated severe bilateral extracranial atherosclerotic ICA stenosis with left-sided predominance and no intracranial involvement. In addition to confirming the cSAHs, a magnetic resonance imaging revealed acute/subacute small ischaemic alterations in the left anterior watershed area. A detailed diagnostic work-up did not reveal an alternative aetiology. Based on the stereotyped presentation, in addition to repetitive transient ischaemic attacks secondary to stenosis, focal epileptic or spell-like episodes triggered by the cSAHs were considered as plausible mechanisms underlying the TFNEs. Given the high TFNE frequency on admission, empirical antiepileptics were initiated; the patient subsequently became asymptomatic and the TFNEs stopped. Secondary stroke prevention was initiated on day 9. Considering the asymptomatic state and the recent intracranial haemorrhages, vascular surgeons opted for elective endarterectomy of the left ICA, which was performed 6 weeks later. The contralateral endarterectomy was performed three months later. The patient is asymptomatic and the antiepileptics have been successfully tapered. We propose that, in our case, cSAHs could be attributed to severe ipsilateral ICA stenosis and consequently recruited fragile leptomeningeal collaterals, similarly to that seen in moyamoya disease/syndrome. The TFNEs most likely developed secondary to a cSAH-associated mechanism reminiscent of that seen in amyloid spells in CAA.
conclusionscSAH is a rare but often symptomatic manifestation of an ipsilateral significant extracranial ICA stenosis, which widens the spectrum of its possible clinical manifestations. Expanding the literature of the few cases previously reported with a similar scenario, our case draws attention to the significance of extracranial vascular imaging in the setting of TFNEs and/or cSAHs, to promote the timely diagnosis of stenotic alterations of potential surgical relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.